https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970
--- Comment #5 from Chris King ---
Would a unit test case be acceptable? That should be an easy way to evince
this bug and I'd be glad to write one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970
--- Comment #4 from Chris King ---
Sorry, not interested: like I said above, it's very difficult to trigger, and
the only code I've been able to trigger it with is proprietary.
You can either read sched-deps.c and understand the code path which f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970
--- Comment #2 from Chris King ---
If you don't want proposed patches attached to bug reports, then I suggest you
remove the text "proposed patch" which is next to the "Add an attachment" link.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |rtl-optimization
Severity|major
