[Bug rtl-optimization/57459] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LRA inheritance bug

2013-06-06 Thread wmi at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57459 --- Comment #6 from wmi at google dot com --- continue the analysis in the first post, for the smallcase 1.c, the IR after calling inherit_in_ebb in lra_inheritance for bb12 is: (insn 289 47 48 12 (set (reg:SI 116 [79]) (reg:SI 121 [79]))

[Bug rtl-optimization/57459] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LRA inheritance bug

2013-06-06 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57459 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #5

[Bug rtl-optimization/57459] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LRA inheritance bug

2013-06-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57459 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Paul Pluzhnikov from comment #3) > Mis-computing strlen() in shipping GCC releases doesn't look like P3 to me. P3 means unset priority.

[Bug rtl-optimization/57459] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LRA inheritance bug

2013-06-05 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57459 --- Comment #3 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- Mis-computing strlen() in shipping GCC releases doesn't look like P3 to me. Could anyone please confirm this bug, set priority appropriately, and/or comment on how this should be fixed? Thanks,

[Bug rtl-optimization/57459] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LRA inheritance bug

2013-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57459 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.1 |4.8.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/57459] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LRA inheritance bug

2013-05-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57459 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra, wrong-code Target Milestone|---