http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55294
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55294
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-11-12
21:55:11 UTC ---
I think this is because:
(subreg:SF (reg/v:V2SF 167 [ a ]) 0)))
is invalid to begin with. Yes we don't reject it but I think we should.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55294
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-11-12 21:53:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 28670
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28670
split1 and subreg2 logs