https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hiraditya at msn dot com
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Can we make init_recog_no_volatile processor a target hook so
that it can be disabled for x86?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoeppe at google dot com
--- Comment #6 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> Why doesn't combine include (clobber (reg:CC 17 flags))?
It has nothing to do with the clobber.
Inside combine_instructions there is a call to init_recog_no_volatile wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Combine generates
Trying 6, 7 -> 8:
Failed to match this instruction:
(set (mem/v:SI (reg/v/f:DI 85 [ i ]) [2 *i_2(D)+0 S4 A32])
(plus:SI (mem/v:SI (reg/v/f:DI 85 [ i ]) [2 *i_2(D)+0 S4 A32])
(const_int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-09
19:48:39 UTC ---
This is a dup of an older bug too though I cannot find it right now. Also it
is related to bug 49807.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
10 matches
Mail list logo
