[Bug rtl-optimization/46265] Missing ifcvt

2021-11-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46265 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|7.1.0 | Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/46265] Missing ifcvt

2010-11-03 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46265 --- Comment #4 from davidxl 2010-11-04 00:55:35 UTC --- Another case that needs to be handled (none of the compiler tested handle it) For ifcvt to happen, control flow needs to be simplified (for case of if-then-else if ..) this is possible whe

[Bug rtl-optimization/46265] Missing ifcvt

2010-11-02 Thread davidxl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46265 --- Comment #3 from davidxl 2010-11-03 05:59:30 UTC --- Another example gcc fails to ifcvt (succeeds only if only one statement is in if and else block. void ref_int_p(int *); void foo (int j, int k) { int i; int a[200], b[100]; i = 0;

[Bug rtl-optimization/46265] Missing ifcvt

2010-11-02 Thread davidxl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46265 davidxl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davidxl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/46265] Missing ifcvt

2010-11-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46265 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|