https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40987
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40987
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a x86_64-linux-gnu testcase:
```
#include
typedef __int128_t mytype;
#define value (((__int128_t)(((unsigned long long)__LONG_LONG_MAX__)+1)) |
(((__int128_t)0xull)<<64))
mytype fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40987
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> This bug is now hard to hit on the trunk as i?86 requires host wide word as
> 64bit.
HWINT is now required to be 64bit for all targets even.
So this might happ
