--- Comment #17 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-03-24 14:46
---
*** Bug 35675 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #16 from belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2008-03-07
12:47 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> This bug was about an infinite loop.
Okay.
--
belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #13 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-03-06 07:33 ---
With the patch from PR33642 on top of rev. 132950, the test suite passed
without regression on i686-apple-darwin9. However on powerpc-apple-darwin9 I
get now:
[karma] f90/bug% gfc -c -frtl-abstract-sequences
/opt/gc
--- Comment #12 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-03-05 22:26 ---
With the patch from PR33642, gcc regtested fine (with the usual failures) on
i686-apple-darwin9.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33009
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-03-05 20:53 ---
Note that I see the problem reported in comment #8 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 too
((insn 139[address=afafafaf pc=003bf7a0]). I have applied the patch from
PR33642 and the manual tests pass.
I am starting a regtest.
-
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-03-05 15:40 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> It seems to me it is the same problem as PR33642.
> Would you be so kind to check it again on i686-apple-darwin9 with the attached
> patch from PR33642?
I am currently regtesting, I'll ap
--- Comment #9 from loki at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-05 14:36 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> With revision 132897 on i686-apple-darwin9 I get:
> ...
> unrecognizable insn:
> (insn 118/opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr33009.c:36:
> internal compiler error: Segme
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-03-05 14:27 ---
With revision 132897 on i686-apple-darwin9 I get:
[ibook-dhum] f90/bug% gfc -c -frtl-abstract-sequences
/opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr33009.c
/opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-tortur
--- Comment #7 from loki at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-05 10:27 ---
Fixed.
--
loki at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from loki at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-05 10:16 ---
Subject: Bug 33009
Author: loki
Date: Wed Mar 5 10:15:45 2008
New Revision: 132893
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132893
Log:
2008-03-05 Gabor Loki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR gcc/33009
--- Comment #5 from loki at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-29 13:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=15245)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15245&action=view)
infinite loop patch v1
This proposed patch fixes the reported bug on i386.
I am going to test it for some other t
--- Comment #4 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-21 16:44 ---
-frtl-abstract-sequences should IMHO be turned on per default for at least -Os
in 4.4
Otherwise literally nobody will notice if it's broken.
thanks,
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33009
--- Comment #3 from loki at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-21 15:48 ---
I can confirm the infinite loop too (r132521).
I am going to look into it.
--
loki at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-07 14:37 ---
I get an ICE:
t.c: In function 'foo':
t.c:28: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 177 0 0 (set (reg:SI 0 ax)
(symbol_ref:SI ("*L9") [flags 0x2])) -1 (nil))
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-07 14:32 ---
-frtl-abstract-sequences is not well tested at all. It is in the same
situation as -fsee. There are no testcases which test it so how do we know it
is broken.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
15 matches
Mail list logo
