https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f87b4ef2323769bd71f7ccea2aa6017a7376f76
commit r11-5090-g7f87b4ef2323769bd71f7ccea2aa6017a7376f76
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Nov 17 06:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
It is fixed by r8-647.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799
Gabriel Ravier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gabravier at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799
--- Comment #6 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
^ Posted by mistake. Sorry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799
Dávid Bolvanský changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
---
--- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-05-05 18:49 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The problem may be patterns like
No, the patterns are OK. Combine pass merges these patterns without problems.
But without links, combine doesn't even try to merge them.
--
http://gcc.gnu.o
--- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-05-05 02:31 ---
The problem may be patterns like
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r,rm,r")
(plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "%0,0,r")
(match_operand:SI 2 "general_operand" "rmni,
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-05-03 17:22 ---
Ah, for some reason insn 13 does not have the insn link pointing to insn 10.
Probably dataflow should/could fix this?
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-05-03 17:08 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> foo:
> addl$1, %edi
> testl %edi, %edi
> movl%edi, (%rdx)
> je .L3
> movl$1, (%rsi)
> .L3:
> rep ; ret
This is just an unfortu
10 matches
Mail list logo
