[Bug rtl-optimization/28140] asm gets lost between 125r.cse2 and 126r.life1

2006-06-22 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-22 21:22 --- (In reply to comment #2) > __asm__ ("choke_me %0 %1 %2" : "+m" (*p1), "+m" (*p2), "+m" (*p3)); > *p1 = val0; > *p2 = val0; > *p3 = val0; > > Actually I don't think so since the asm is dead co

[Bug rtl-optimization/28140] asm gets lost between 125r.cse2 and 126r.life1

2006-06-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-22 20:56 --- __asm__ ("choke_me %0 %1 %2" : "+m" (*p1), "+m" (*p2), "+m" (*p3)); *p1 = val0; *p2 = val0; *p3 = val0; Actually I don't think so since the asm is dead code as the stores to *p1, *p2, and *p3

[Bug rtl-optimization/28140] asm gets lost between 125r.cse2 and 126r.life1

2006-06-22 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-22 19:43 --- Created an attachment (id=11731) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11731&action=view) test case This test case should fail to assemble. Yet it does at -O1 or higher. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bug