--- Comment #16 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-20 16:57 ---
Yes, this is a regression.
It works fine with -O2 with my system compiler (FC5 gcc, based on gcc 4.1).
It also works fine with -O2 using my gcc 4.1 build.
It fails with svn head.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #15 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-14 08:27 ---
I don't think this bug has anything to do with excess precision. Valgrind
shows that, when compiled at -O2, we are reading from uninitialized memory.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28096
--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 08:32
---
Please indicate whether it's a regression from earlier versions of GCC.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #13 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
2006-09-11 19:47 ---
In my sources for David Gay's gdtoa implemntation it say this:
/* On a machine with IEEE extended-precision registers, it is
* necessary to specify double-precision (53-bit) rounding precision
* befo
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 18:18
---
-O2 -fno-gcse works.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Com
