--- Comment #21 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-17 15:39
---
Subject: Bug 26449
Author: rakdver
Date: Mon Sep 17 15:38:48 2007
New Revision: 128549
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128549
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/26449
* loop-invariant.
--- Comment #20 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-14 15:57
---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Zdenek, the fix in Comment #5 is wrong (please look at Comment #11 why), as
> cofirmed by a couple of dupes. From PR 33428:
actually the fix in loop-invariant is correct for the origina
--- Comment #19 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-09-14 05:49 ---
Zdenek, the fix in Comment #5 is wrong (please look at Comment #11 why), as
cofirmed by a couple of dupes. From PR 33428:
gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-15.c fails with -O1 -ftree-vectorize (x86_64):
loop-15.c: In function
--- Comment #18 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-09-14 05:41 ---
*** Bug 33428 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #17 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-09-08 11:51 ---
The testcase from comment #11 was added to the testsuite, but let's keep this
PR resolved as WORKSFORME for now. Please note that force_operand() will still
ICE for optabs with no handler.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-08 11:48 ---
Subject: Bug 26449
Author: uros
Date: Sat Sep 8 11:48:17 2007
New Revision: 128270
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128270
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/26449
* gcc.target/i386/pr2644
--- Comment #15 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-09-08 11:35 ---
Reopened. Ther is really no magic here.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-08 11:33 ---
Subject: Bug 26449
Author: uros
Date: Sat Sep 8 11:33:08 2007
New Revision: 128269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128269
Log:
PR target/33329
PR target/26449
* config/i
--- Comment #13 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-06-01 07:29 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> New test (from PR32123):
>
> Standalone testcase, compile with -O2 -msse2 -mtune=k8:
Hm, this bug was misteriously fixed. It was manifested as
gcc.target/i386/sse2-vec-6.c failure in [1] and
--- Comment #12 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-06-01 06:42 ---
*** Bug 32123 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #11 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-06-01 06:42 ---
New test (from PR32123):
Standalone testcase, compile with -O2 -msse2 -mtune=k8:
--cut here--
typedef short __v8hi __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16)));
typedef long long __m128i __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16)))
--- Comment #10 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-06-01 06:39 ---
Not fixed, please look for the same failure at PR32123.
start_sequence ();
op = force_operand (SET_SRC (set), reg);
+ if (!op)
+ {
+ end_sequence ();
+ goto f
12 matches
Mail list logo
