--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 02:11
---
Showstopper.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 00:14 ---
Note the shortest (C) testcase get that pattern is:
_Complex double f(void);
void g(void)
{
_Complex double a = f();
}
Though will not cause the ICE.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24823
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 00:06 ---
The instruction:
(call_insn:HI 361 360 362 32 (set (parallel:DC [
(expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg:DF 21 xmm0)
(const_int 0 [0x0]))
(expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg:DF 22 x
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 00:02 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Btw., this also happens on armv4l compiling NX:
That might be a different bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24823
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 11:47 ---
Btw., this also happens on armv4l compiling NX:
gcc -c -O3 -fsigned-char -I. -I../../exports/include/freetype2
-I../../extras/freetype2/src-I../../extras/freetype2/src/base
-I../../extras/freetype
--- Comment #5 from krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 16:47 ---
The only difference my patch brought is different behaviour
of mark_set_1 if it is called under wrong! conditions. Will
say that only in case somebody calls mark_set_1 clobbering a reg which
is live afterwards - we
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 01:45 ---
A regression hunt using an x86_64 cross compiler identified:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=106686
r106686 | krebbel | 2005-11-09 11:34:56 + (Wed, 09 Nov 2005) | 8 lines
2005-11-09 Andreas Krebbel <[E
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 19:10 ---
Confirmed.
106665 works, 106727 fails
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24823
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 18:40 ---
This is a recent regression. This worked with PR 20051106 but not with
2005.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 18:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=10228)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10228&action=view)
reduced testcase
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24823
11 matches
Mail list logo
