[Bug rtl-optimization/24814] unrolling doesn't put loop notes in right place

2006-04-24 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 22:34 --- What are loop notes again? Ah, yes. Legacy. Fixed on mainline. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug rtl-optimization/24814] unrolling doesn't put loop notes in right place

2006-03-07 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 22:42 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Yes, if you need to detect loops, call the routine to detect natural loops. > This is the way of the future. > LOOP_NOTES are not. Is flow_loops_find and the data that it initailizes a sta

[Bug rtl-optimization/24814] unrolling doesn't put loop notes in right place

2006-03-07 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 21:50 --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Actually there is nothing that uses LOOP_NOTEs other than the old RTL loop > > optimizer. At least, nothing that _should_ use it. Wanna know about > > loops?

[Bug rtl-optimization/24814] unrolling doesn't put loop notes in right place

2006-03-07 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 20:52 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Actually there is nothing that uses LOOP_NOTEs other than the old RTL loop > optimizer. At least, nothing that _should_ use it. Wanna know about loops? > Find natural loops instead of de

[Bug rtl-optimization/24814] unrolling doesn't put loop notes in right place

2006-02-27 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-27 14:04 --- Actually there is nothing that uses LOOP_NOTEs other than the old RTL loop optimizer. At least, nothing that _should_ use it. Wanna know about loops? Find natural loops instead of depending on the notes. But the p

[Bug rtl-optimization/24814] unrolling doesn't put loop notes in right place

2005-11-11 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 21:44 --- (In reply to comment #2) > LOOP NOTES should be removed in 4.2 when loop.c is removed. > There is more than loop.c which currently uses LOOP NOTES. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24814

[Bug rtl-optimization/24814] unrolling doesn't put loop notes in right place

2005-11-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 21:05 --- LOOP NOTES should be removed in 4.2 when loop.c is removed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24814

[Bug rtl-optimization/24814] unrolling doesn't put loop notes in right place

2005-11-11 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 20:59 --- Created an attachment (id=10221) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10221&action=view) test case When compiling this test case with -O2 -funroll-loops for i686 or sh-elf, the NOTE_INSN_LOOP_BEG and