http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24760
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
--- Comment #13 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-15 16:08
---
This might be fixed now, but somebody should check before this PR is closed.
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #12 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 16:32
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], PR 4520.
Thanks. This PR is indeed about a different issue, so I have opened
PR24801 to track the debug info issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 15:37
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Most (if not all) of these issues are usually a pass depending on addresses
> > being the same.
> > I think David E. has a bug filed about one of these issue
--- Comment #10 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 13:39
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Most (if not all) of these issues are usually a pass depending on addresses
> being the same.
> I think David E. has a bug filed about one of these issues already.
>
I've tried to searc
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 14:45 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 14:17 ---
Subject: Re: -d option changes generated code
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --070507020407080301090707
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Trans
--- Comment #7 from joern dot rennecke at st dot com 2005-11-10 14:11
---
Subject: Re: -d option changes generated code
rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>--- Comment #6 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 22:36
>---
>Yes, this is indeed the case. I am testi
--- Comment #6 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 22:36 ---
Yes, this is indeed the case. I am testing the fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24760
--- Comment #5 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 20:56 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> -da without -quiet generally produces code that is larger than any of the
> above
> scenarios, but sometimes it produces identical code to -quiet (without -da).
>
I have now captured fou
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 19:35 ---
I have observed the -quiet influence only with a proprietary testcase so far
(EEMBC aiifft01/bmark.c for sh-elf -m4 -ml -g -O3 -version -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops --param max-inline-insns-single=5).
Comp
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 19:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=10192)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10192&action=view)
test case
This is a shorter test case, but only debug information changes were observed
for this test case. co
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 18:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=10191)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10191&action=view)
test case
Mainline version 106440 configured for i686-pc-linux-gnu --with-arch=i686:
../../i686/gcc/cc1 -fprep
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 18:52 ---
Most (if not all) of these issues are usually a pass depending on addresses
being the same.
I think David E. has a bug filed about one of these issues already.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2476
14 matches
Mail list logo
