[Bug rtl-optimization/18560] better optimalization of EOR/MOV block.

2007-11-09 Thread rask at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rask at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 20:40 --- This has been fixed for more than a year: reverse: @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0 @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0 @ link register save eliminated. eor r3, r0, r0, ror

[Bug rtl-optimization/18560] better optimalization of EOR/MOV block.

2005-02-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.0.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18560

[Bug rtl-optimization/18560] better optimalization of EOR/MOV block.

2005-02-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18560

[Bug rtl-optimization/18560] better optimalization of EOR/MOV block.

2005-02-11 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-11 11:13 --- I've linked this to the register-allocator meta-bug -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDepends

[Bug rtl-optimization/18560] better optimalization of EOR/MOV block.

2005-02-11 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-11 10:47 --- (In reply to comment #4) > The new register allocator (new-ra) has been removed because it was buggy and > there were no plans to fix it. > I was using it to show that the initial MOV was an unrelated issue. > Y

[Bug rtl-optimization/18560] better optimalization of EOR/MOV block.

2005-02-11 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-11 10:15 --- The new register allocator (new-ra) has been removed because it was buggy and there were no plans to fix it. I was using it to show that the initial MOV was an unrelated issue. Your code snippet shows tha

[Bug rtl-optimization/18560] better optimalization of EOR/MOV block.

2005-02-10 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-10 20:17 --- (In reply to comment #2) > As Andrew pointed out, the merge of the eor and the rotate is now done on > mainline in 4.0. Hmm, it doesn't work on my gcc. # arm-pld-linux-gcc reversing_the_bytes_in_word.c -

[Bug rtl-optimization/18560] better optimalization of EOR/MOV block.

2004-12-13 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 15:16 --- As Andrew pointed out, the merge of the eor and the rotate is now done on mainline in 4.0. The initial redundant MOV is a register allocation artifact. This particular testcase compiles optimally with the

[Bug rtl-optimization/18560] better optimalization of EOR/MOV block.

2004-11-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-19 14:50 --- Confirmed, the mainline produces better code already: mov r3, r0 eor r0, r0, r0, ror #16 bic r0, r0, #16711680 mov r0, r0, lsr #8 eor r0, r0, r3, r