[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

2005-07-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17808

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

2005-07-29 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 12:39 --- It seems we've dealt with all the fall-out now. -- What|Removed |Added Status|

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

2005-07-29 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 17808 depends on bug 23117, which changed state. Bug 23117 Summary: [4.1 Regression] ICE on valid code while building libgcc http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23117 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

2005-07-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-27 16:28 --- Subject: Bug 17808 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-27 16:28:38 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog sched-deps.c sched-ebb.c sc

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

2005-07-27 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-27 11:50 --- My patch was approved: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00286.html I had hoped some ARM person would act on one of my requests to test the patch on ARM, but since this hasn't happened, I am go

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

2005-07-27 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |steven at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

2005-07-07 Thread wilson at specifix dot com
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2005-07-08 00:08 --- Subject: Re: Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > /tmp/ccBDW5xy.s:186: Warning: Additional NOP may be necessary to workaround > Itanium processor A/B step errata

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

2005-07-03 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 14:52 --- The extra failures are assembler warnings: Executing on host: /abuild/stevenb/build/gcc/xgcc -B/abuild/stevenb/build/gcc/ /abuild/stevenb/mainline/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/920625-1.c -w -O3

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

2005-07-03 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-03 13:41 --- Testing my patch on ia64 still reveals two new failures: gcc.c-torture/execute/920625-1.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions gcc.c-torture/execute/920625-1.c comp

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

2005-06-29 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-29 23:54 --- May or may not be on to something in the message I dropped here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-06/msg01281.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17808

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

2005-06-28 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28 14:06 --- It is maybe a bit hard to investigate this bug because it actually causes bootstrap failures on e.g. ia64, and even a normal "make" seems to produce bad crt* stuff. So I took a different approach: Index