https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119961
--- Comment #10 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> > No this is the same problem as PR 116600. Just the ICE shows up.
>
> What is happening is shrink wrapping is moving
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119961
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> No this is the same problem as PR 116600. Just the ICE shows up.
What is happening is shrink wrapping is moving the restore to the edge of the
basic block conta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119961
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119961
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #6)
> # gcc/cc1 -quiet test.c -O2 -std=gnu11 -o test.s
> -Wno-incompatible-pointer-types -fno-jump-tables
> -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
>
> The problem of bug 11660
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119961
--- Comment #2 from chenglulu ---
Created attachment 61212
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61212&action=edit
test-pro_and_epilogue.png
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119961
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119961
chenglulu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119961
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119961
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119961
--- Comment #1 from chenglulu ---
Created attachment 61211
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61211&action=edit
test-ree.png
10 matches
Mail list logo
