[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-03-21 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-03-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #25 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:78592fdbdc18013387d9854805b5cbf6d19c2110 commit r15-8656-g78592fdbdc18013387d9854805b5cbf6d19c2110 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-03-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #23

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-03-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #24 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #21) > Andrew, any progress on bisecting the bootstrap failure? I put all of the details I have found about the bisect in PR 118615. Including the small testcase whi

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-03-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- Also, I wonder about different calls in the same function with different ABIs (whether from IPA-RA which finds out some call doesn't clobber some reg while another one does, or function attributes, ...).

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-03-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek --- Andrew, any progress on bisecting the bootstrap failure? In any case, looking at the patch: + if (call_save_p && latest_call_insn != NULL) +/* PR116028: If original_regno is a pseudo that has been ass

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-03-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-03-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #18) > Is this failing still after r15-7400? Yes this one is still failing for aarch64: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr10474.c scan-rtl-dump pro_and_epilogue "Performing shrink-wrapping

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-03-14 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #18 from Sam James --- Is this failing still after r15-7400?

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-02-09 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-02-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a commit r15-7400-gd3ff498c478acefce35de04402f99171b4f64a1a Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sun Feb 2 07

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-02-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Surya Kumari Jangala from comment #14) > (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #13) > > (In reply to Surya Kumari Jangala from comment #3) > > > The parameter register is > > > saved in a

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-02-04 Thread jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #14 from Surya Kumari Jangala --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #13) > (In reply to Surya Kumari Jangala from comment #3) > > The parameter register is > > saved in a volatile register which is saved on stack in the entr

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-02-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-02-04 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #13 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Surya Kumari Jangala from comment #3) > The parameter register is > saved in a volatile register which is saved on stack in the entry bb. > Instead, if the volatile register is saved just be

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 Regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-02-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-02-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2025-01-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Bug 116028 depends on bug 118615, which changed state. Bug 118615 Summary: [15 Regression] Bootstrap failure on aarch64 after r15-2810 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118615 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2024-09-03 Thread thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2024-08-09 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolutio

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2024-08-08 Thread jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Surya Kumari Jangala changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2024-08-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Surya Kumari Jangala : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c67a0fa1dd39a3378deb854a7fef0ff7fe38004 commit r15-2810-g3c67a0fa1dd39a3378deb854a7fef0ff7fe38004 Author: Surya Kumari Jang

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2024-08-01 Thread jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #7 from Surya Kumari Jangala --- I have posted a patch for the fix.

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2024-07-24 Thread jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #6 from Surya Kumari Jangala --- The test gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-1.c has been marked as an XFAIL on powerpc. The test fails as shrink wrapping does not happen as expected. The reason that the shrink wrapping doesn't happen is the

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2024-07-23 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- I'll file a new PR for that then if I can reproduce still. Will check.

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2024-07-23 Thread jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 --- Comment #4 from Surya Kumari Jangala --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > Yeah, I mentioned it when filing PR115673, but I wasn't sure if they were > all the same cause so didn't want to file a bunch without knowing. I am not able

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2024-07-23 Thread jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Surya Kumari Jangala changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64-*-* |aarch64-*-* powerpc*-*-* --- Com

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2024-07-23 Thread jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Surya Kumari Jangala changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-*-* --- Comment #2 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2024-07-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2024-07-22 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org Summar

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure

2024-07-22 Thread jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Surya Kumari Jangala changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-07-22 Ever confirmed|0