http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-02
08:12:54 UTC ---
Does this work now?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
--- Comment #8 from Changpeng Fang 2011-01-03
22:30:22 UTC ---
>
> Which instructions are missing in Bobcat?
At least 3DNow instructions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-03 22:04:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The OS is SLES 11, SP1. The machine (bobcat) indeed does not
> support some instructions that K8 supports.
>
Which instructions are missing in Bobcat?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
--- Comment #6 from Changpeng Fang 2011-01-03
21:59:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Does your glibc have CPU specific optimizations?
I don't think so.
The OS is SLES 11, SP1. The machine (bobcat) indeed does not
support some instructions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
--- Comment #4 from Changpeng Fang 2010-12-23
18:08:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Can you supply a simplified test case?
>
The difficulty is that the bug only shows up on a new AMD system (bobcat). The
compiled binary on bobcat can run
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
Changpeng Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|465.tonto Segmentation |465.tonto Segmentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
--- Comment #1 from Changpeng Fang 2010-12-22
00:55:35 UTC ---
Initially I thought it is a glibc bug, but seems it is not:
(1) A workaround flag is -fno-caller-saves
(2) The compile binary (NOTE: with -static) runs correctly on other systems
Th
