https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89380
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I think these kind of questions should be handled in gcc-help@ rather than
> here. Maybe in a standard C forum too.
^^ this,
"How do I do funky things with t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89380
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to mdblack98 from comment #5)
> Why can't it be fixed by not counting commas between braces? That seems to
> be the problem.
Because then GCC will break some valid C code :). I think you should m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89380
--- Comment #5 from mdblack98 at yahoo dot com ---
Why can't it be fixed by not counting commas between braces? That seems to be
the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89380
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
You can do dirty things with hiding the comma behind a macro, but don't do this
at home, kids.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89380
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89380
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://stuff.mit.edu/afs/athena/project/rhel-doc/3/rhel-cpp-en-3/macro-pitfalls.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89380
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think these kind of questions should be handled in gcc-help@ rather than
here. Maybe in a standard C forum too.
