[Bug preprocessor/62086] A bug with option -fextended-identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug preprocessor/62086] A bug with option -fextended-identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086 baoshan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/62086] A bug with option -fextended-identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- See regarding the #if 0 question. You could always raise a DR with WG14 or WG21 to try to get this question resolved properly. (4.9 implemen

[Bug preprocessor/62086] A bug with option -fextended-identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/62086] A bug with option -fextended-identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- N.B. you're not compiling it as C++11, you're compiling it as C89

[Bug preprocessor/62086] A bug with option -fextended-identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086 --- Comment #2 from baoshan --- Are you sure \u00A8\u00AA\u00AD\u00AF\u00B2\u00B5 is invalid for C++ standard? or it is just invalid for GCC now? I extracted this code from a C++ test suite, and I think it should be valid for C++11.

[Bug preprocessor/62086] A bug with option -fextended-identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to baoshan from comment #0) > For this simple code, it would compile without -fextended-identifiers but > fail with it: I think this is correct behavior as the C standard requires the #if 0 code to