https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #23 from Lewis Hyatt ---
Fixed for GCC 11, may I ask someone please to close the PR?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:004bb936d6d5f177af26ad4905595e843d5665a5
commit r11-2092-g004bb936d6d5f177af26ad4905595e843d5665a5
Author: Lewis Hyatt
Date: Tue J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #21 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #20)
> I've committed r279137 on Lewis's behalf, which fixes the issues identified
> in patch #13.
comment #13, I meant to say
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #20 from David Malcolm ---
I've committed r279137 on Lewis's behalf, which fixes the issues identified in
patch #13.
As noted in review of the patch, we didn't attempt to change the behavior of
diagnostic_get_location_text with this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #19 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Dec 9 20:03:47 2019
New Revision: 279137
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279137&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Byte vs column awareness for diagnostic-show-locus.c (PR 49973)
contr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #18 from Lewis Hyatt ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #17)
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, lhyatt at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > In any case, the underlying source of wcwidth() could easily be changed as a
> > drop-in repl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, lhyatt at gmail dot com wrote:
> In any case, the underlying source of wcwidth() could easily be changed as a
> drop-in replacement so I guess it can also be decided la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #16 from Lewis Hyatt ---
Thank you both for the feedback so far. Regarding the use of wcwidth(), one
thing I noticed is that glibc has a much different result than gnulib does, say
for instance emojis return width 2 in the former rath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Lewis Hyatt from comment #13)
> I have one other question though. This quick attempt uses wchar.h, namely
> the mbrtowc() and wcwidth() functions. Firstly, it seems unfortunate to
> introd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #14 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019, lhyatt at gmail dot com wrote:
> I feel like the most portable solution is just to use directly the necessary
> code (from glibc or gnulib or from scratch or wherever)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lhyatt at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13 fr
12 matches
Mail list logo
