[Bug preprocessor/45696] Continuation character gets lost or not taken into account

2011-01-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45696 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gccbugzi...@trash-mail.com --- Comment

[Bug preprocessor/45696] Continuation character gets lost or not taken into account

2010-09-17 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 08:54 --- I have seen this question/bug reported a couple of times in bugzilla and a few more in gcc-help, so I added a FAQ: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#cpp_continuation_discarded I suggest that it is rather more useful to answ

[Bug preprocessor/45696] Continuation character gets lost or not taken into account

2010-09-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 07:09 --- You can use gcc -E -P, then it doesn't print # lines and puts the label and fn on the same line (as, without the line notes locations aren't preserved anyway). As Andrew wrote, gcc -E is a C/C++ preprocessor, and the

[Bug preprocessor/45696] Continuation character gets lost or not taken into account

2010-09-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 00:06 --- (In reply to comment #2) > I don't understand why the continuation character should be removed. For the C > parser that character is not special (only for the C preprocessor it is), nor > it confuses its line number

[Bug preprocessor/45696] Continuation character gets lost or not taken into account

2010-09-16 Thread John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net
--- Comment #2 from John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net 2010-09-17 00:04 --- I don't understand why the continuation character should be removed. For the C parser that character is not special (only for the C preprocessor it is), nor it confuses its line number accountancy. Or am I mistake

[Bug preprocessor/45696] Continuation character gets lost or not taken into account

2010-09-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 23:55 --- C preprocessor is not a generic preprocessor. The continuation character is removed so the correct line number is used. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed