[Bug preprocessor/35313] Valid pp-expression rejected in C99 mode

2008-07-04 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 19:44 --- No version of GCC with any C99 support accepted this before 4.4, so not a regression; closing. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug preprocessor/35313] Valid pp-expression rejected in C99 mode

2008-05-06 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-06 18:09 --- Fixed on trunk. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|

[Bug preprocessor/35313] Valid pp-expression rejected in C99 mode

2008-05-06 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-06 17:15 --- Subject: Bug 35313 Author: tromey Date: Tue May 6 17:15:07 2008 New Revision: 134989 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134989 Log: gcc/testsuite PR preprocessor/35313, PR preprocessor/36

[Bug preprocessor/35313] Valid pp-expression rejected in C99 mode

2008-05-01 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 19:31 --- Testing a patch. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|u

[Bug preprocessor/35313] Valid pp-expression rejected in C99 mode

2008-04-30 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 18:48 --- Confirmed. I think this is related to PR 36088. I think the operator precedence code is subtly wrong with ?: -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --