[Bug preprocessor/31869] stringifying empty macros

2009-04-12 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-12 22:23 --- Fixed for 4.5. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug preprocessor/31869] stringifying empty macros

2009-04-12 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-12 22:20 --- Subject: Bug 31869 Author: jsm28 Date: Sun Apr 12 22:20:02 2009 New Revision: 145989 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145989 Log: libcpp: PR preprocessor/31869 * macro.c (stringif

[Bug preprocessor/31869] stringifying empty macros

2009-03-29 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||16620, 16989 nThis||

[Bug preprocessor/31869] stringifying empty macros

2007-12-28 Thread truedfx at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #4 from truedfx at gentoo dot org 2007-12-28 20:59 --- Yes, gcc 2.95.3 got it right, the program used to keep the space: .. . . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31869

[Bug preprocessor/31869] stringifying empty macros

2007-05-09 Thread truedfx at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #3 from truedfx at gentoo dot org 2007-05-10 00:33 --- I see the same behaviour with gcc 3.3.6. I'm not able to check even older versions for now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31869

[Bug preprocessor/31869] stringifying empty macros

2007-05-08 Thread neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from neil at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-09 05:01 --- The space is required by the standard. Is this a regression? I believe GCC used to get this right but I could be wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31869

[Bug preprocessor/31869] stringifying empty macros

2007-05-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-09 03:14 --- I don't see a problem with this .. are two different tokens (.) so getting rid of the space is ok here. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31869