https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31186
--- Comment #6 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
OK, so I think there is a bug in the autotools, which use -I instead of
-isystem (unless this has changed).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31186
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
--- Comment #4 from vincent at vinc17 dot org 2007-05-22 22:50 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> My recollection is that the special -I behavior is there because
> the system headers have special non-warning properties.
> This situation doesn't apply to -L.
But this introduces an inconsist
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 19:11 ---
My recollection is that the special -I behavior is there because
the system headers have special non-warning properties.
This situation doesn't apply to -L.
> 2. Software is often compiled with configure, make, make
--- Comment #2 from vincent at vinc17 dot org 2007-03-15 16:51 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't think this is a bug, you need to read the other part of the document
> which says if you supply -I DEFAULT_DIR, it is ignored.
OK, but this isn't very clear, as the description under -i
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-15 15:48 ---
I don't think this is a bug, you need to read the other part of the document
which says if you supply -I DEFAULT_DIR, it is ignored.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31186
