--- Comment #13 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-28 19:11 ---
This isn't really a gcc bug per se, so I am closing it.
If someone wants to implement one or all of these on a branch,
that is still fine.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2006-10-01 11:25
---
Subject: Re: want way to #include but still able to
finish compiling
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, acahalan at gmail dot com wrote:
> > But after the proposal has been written formally.
>
> I have been assuming you have
--- Comment #11 from acahalan at gmail dot com 2006-10-01 07:50 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> > I'm more familiar with the POSIX/UNIX standardization than the C/C++
> > standardization. Perhaps they have very different rules, but what
> > I've seen with the one group is that the commit
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-10-01 05:36
---
Subject: Re: want way to #include but still able
to finish compiling
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 05:32 +, acahalan at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> --- Comment #9 from acahalan at gmail dot com 2006-10-
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 05:32 +, acahalan at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> --- Comment #9 from acahalan at gmail dot com 2006-10-01 05:32 ---
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > This is definitely firmly in the class of "extension to the language that
> > requires a thorough proposal to be presen
--- Comment #9 from acahalan at gmail dot com 2006-10-01 05:32 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is definitely firmly in the class of "extension to the language that
> requires a thorough proposal to be presented to the standards committee"
Of course. I mentioned that.
I'm more famil
--- Comment #8 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-30 15:37 ---
Subject: Re: want way to #include but still able to finish compiling
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:09:12AM -, bangerth at dealii dot org wrote:
> Daniel, would you prefer if we marked this as WONTFIX? I think this th
--- Comment #7 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-09-28 06:09 ---
Daniel, would you prefer if we marked this as WONTFIX? I think this thing
is so contentious that we're not going to do anything about it until there's
some sort of resolutions from the ISO committees.
I just don't see a
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-28 02:02 ---
Note I would rather you post stuff like this to the C standards committee
instead of posting bugs. Maybe even to gcc@gcc.gnu.org before filing a bug for
something which most people disagree on. It is one thing for
