--- Comment #5 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-28 01:32 ---
While I firmly agree with Wolfgang, my same comment about the meaning of
"RESOLVED/INVALID" applies here also.
--
drow at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-09-27 04:30 ---
This is definitely firmly in the class of "extension to the language that
requires a thorough proposal to be presented to the standards committee"
things. I don't think anyone is even remotely interested in implementing
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-27 04:08 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Use autoconf like the GNU coding style recommends.
>
> That is exactly the the main "gross hack" I refer to.
How is it a gross hack. Really what you are requ
--- Comment #2 from acahalan at gmail dot com 2006-09-27 04:03 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Use autoconf like the GNU coding style recommends.
That is exactly the the main "gross hack" I refer to.
Hacks like autoconf should not be necessary. People
also hack around the problem with cm
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-27 00:32 ---
Use autoconf like the GNU coding style recommends.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
