[Bug preprocessor/28227] valid #ifdef rejected

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 05:36 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug preprocessor/28227] valid #ifdef rejected

2007-01-12 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-12 19:47 --- Subject: Bug 28227 Author: tromey Date: Fri Jan 12 19:46:49 2007 New Revision: 120731 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120731 Log: libcpp PR preprocessor/28227: * directives.c (l

[Bug preprocessor/28227] valid #ifdef rejected

2007-01-07 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug preprocessor/28227] valid #ifdef rejected

2006-12-29 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-29 17:35 --- Subject: Bug number PR preprocessor/28227 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01835.html -- http://gcc.gnu.o

[Bug preprocessor/28227] valid #ifdef rejected

2006-12-27 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-28 01:28 --- Also 6.10.8.4 says that various other macros, like __DATE__, shall not be the subject of #define or #undef. Currently we warn in these cases but perhaps we ought to have a pedwarn instead. I have a patch for the '#i