https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93965
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93965
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0afd41f8e6530b13421679801cf73cb6bef3
commit r8-10102-g0afd41f8e6530b13421679801cf73cb6bef3
Author: Martin Liska
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93965
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9179ae6a0df27e3d3830ee42f755dc7d76cb0423
commit r9-8303-g9179ae6a0df27e3d3830ee42f755dc7d76cb0423
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93965
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93965
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08bf7bde9f2987b1c623d272cc71fc14a1622442
commit r10-6921-g08bf7bde9f2987b1c623d272cc71fc14a1622442
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93965
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93965
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I don't see the point of [-]* btw, could be just -* or maybe better -\? (though
not sure if that is portable enough).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93965
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Dunno, but wouldn't it be better to require either no -s or both, but not just
one?
So
sed -n
's,^.*\([2-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]\)\([-]*\)\([01][0-9]\)\2\([0-3][0-9]\).*$,\1\3\4,p'
?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93965
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
