https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93090
--- Comment #7 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> Can this be closed now?
Yes.
I think there is still some money in the Bountysource campaign, not sure what
will happen with it. I'll contact them
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93090
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Can this be closed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93090
--- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> FWIW there's also:
> https://github.com/antoyo/rustc_codegen_gcc
> which isn't a GCC Rust frontend per se, but uses libgccjit to embed GCC as a
> co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93090
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
FWIW there's also:
https://github.com/antoyo/rustc_codegen_gcc
which isn't a GCC Rust frontend per se, but uses libgccjit to embed GCC as a
code generation backend inside the existing rustc compiler (I'm th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93090
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|2020-01-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93090
--- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
It seems that the gccrs frontend is now sponsored by two companies, so I think
it's fine to stop the Bountysource campaign [1] and move the money to other
Bountysource campaigns.
> [1] https://ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93090
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93090
--- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> The Go FE actually isn't that independent, the same gofrontend is used by
> both GCC and LLVM, the same FE written in C++ in that case has then a
> co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93090
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
