https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #6)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> > If the warning is based of a const, maybe lead with that e.g. in the 2nd
> > place here:
> >
> > bug.c:11:5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
If the warning is based of a const, maybe lead with that e.g. in the 2nd place
here:
bug.c:11:5: warning: 'memset': specified size 18446744073709551611 (aka
0x___fffb, 1<<64 - 5, SOME_CONST) exce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Maybe could also make creative use of underscores in large hex values to make
things easier on the eye e.g.:
bug.c:11:5: warning: 'memset': specified size 18446744073709551611 (aka
0x___fffb, 1<<
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Maybe all four (decimal, hex, formula, and constant):
bug.c:11:5: warning: 'memset': specified size 18446744073709551611 (aka
0xfffb, 1<<64 - 5, SOME_CONST) exceeds maximum object size
9223372036
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
