https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70945
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70945
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, can't we just add the __*_finite aliases (or wrappers) to the nvptx newlib?
That sounds easiest to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70945
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Wed Oct 19 21:24:37 2016
New Revision: 241355
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241355&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR other/70945] Handle function_glibc_finite_math in offloading
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70945
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38484|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70945
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 13 May 2016, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> We could get rid of this heuristic (the property function_glibc_finite_math in
> combination with matching declarations' names) if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70945
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
I like to avoid touching generic stuff for issues like this one. Please see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg01022.html for a brief outline of
an alternative solution: I think my proposal of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70945
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70945
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
