[Bug other/67627] libatomic parallel build failure

2016-01-06 Thread nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67627 nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/67627] libatomic parallel build failure

2016-01-06 Thread nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67627 --- Comment #4 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: nsz Date: Wed Jan 6 17:43:24 2016 New Revision: 232107 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232107&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-06 Szabolcs Nagy Backport from mainline:

[Bug other/67627] libatomic parallel build failure

2016-01-06 Thread nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67627 --- Comment #3 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: nsz Date: Wed Jan 6 17:32:41 2016 New Revision: 232105 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232105&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-06 Szabolcs Nagy Backport from mainline:

[Bug other/67627] libatomic parallel build failure

2016-01-06 Thread nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67627 --- Comment #2 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: nsz Date: Wed Jan 6 14:51:35 2016 New Revision: 232102 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232102&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix libatomic multilib parallel build (PR other/67627) The all-mult

[Bug other/67627] libatomic parallel build failure

2015-09-22 Thread nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67627 --- Comment #1 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- adding all-multi: $(libatomic_la_LIBADD) to libatomic/Makefile.in solves the problem for me, but i'm not sure what's the automake way of doing this