https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63613
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkorb at gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63613
--- Comment #12 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #11)
> Patch posted as https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00468.html
Does this still apply?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63613
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
Patch posted as https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00468.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63613
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63613
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to dmalcolm from comment #7)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> > Let's keep this open for a fix includes solution.
>
> Does anything in gcc's bootstrap or testsuite actually use dejag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63613
--- Comment #8 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to dmalcolm from comment #7)
[...]
> (B) GCC release notes, for some kind of 5.0 porting guide (i.e.
> "what does an end-user need to know about the gnu11 change?")
...and I se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63613
--- Comment #7 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> Let's keep this open for a fix includes solution.
Does anything in gcc's bootstrap or testsuite actually use dejagnu.h? (other
than my jit.exp on th
