[Bug other/60589] Parallel install fails due to multiple cilk.h installs

2014-04-10 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60589 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/60589] Parallel install fails due to multiple cilk.h installs

2014-03-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60589 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Mar 20 19:50:51 2014 New Revision: 208736 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208736&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-03-20 Tobias Burnus PR other/60589 Reverted:

[Bug other/60589] Parallel install fails due to multiple cilk.h installs

2014-03-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60589 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2) > Probably the right choice is to simply revert r208440. Unrelated to the revert: GCC currently installs cilk (and also ssp) under both ./lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-lin

[Bug other/60589] Parallel install fails due to multiple cilk.h installs

2014-03-19 Thread y.gribov at samsung dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60589 --- Comment #3 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2) > > BTW could someone add libcilkrts to list of components? > > What do you mean by this? No-no, I meant a bugzilla component so that I could fire bugs against Cilk

[Bug other/60589] Parallel install fails due to multiple cilk.h installs

2014-03-19 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60589 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|