https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54411
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54411
--- Comment #5 from Florian Weimer 2012-09-18 08:34:12
UTC ---
Author: fw
Date: Tue Sep 18 08:34:05 2012
New Revision: 191413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191413
Log:
PR other/54411: integer overflow in objalloc_alloc
2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54411
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-08-29 21:29:12 UTC ---
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, fw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > You do realise that pretty much nothing in the toolchain checks for
> > overflows in calculating allocation size
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54411
--- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer 2012-08-29 19:18:58
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> You do realise that pretty much nothing in the toolchain checks for
> overflows in calculating allocation sizes?
bfd_alloc2 (bfd's XNEWVEC variant) contai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54411
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-08-29 19:09:55 UTC ---
You do realise that pretty much nothing in the toolchain checks for
overflows in calculating allocation sizes? If you want to fix such
issues more systematically, th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54411
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
