--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-14 16:10 ---
FIXED in gcc 4.6.
Thanks Simon for the original idea.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-14 16:08 ---
Subject: Bug 42966
Author: manu
Date: Wed Apr 14 16:08:23 2010
New Revision: 158349
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158349
Log:
2010-04-14 Manuel López-Ibáñez
PR 42966
* di
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-27 18:49 ---
Patch approved http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg01138.html
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 20:58 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-05 01:20 ---
@Simon,
I think this solution would be accepted more readily by everybody, since anyway
we already have the [-W*] markers for most warnings except default ones. What
do you think?
I specially like showing the flag for
