--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-02 20:47
---
Yes, is not fixed in 4.3.3. Is already fixed for 4.3.4, etc.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #8 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2009-07-02 20:42 ---
Though perhaps I didn't need to reopen.
Just making sure: could you reproduce it with one of
the mentioned versions ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40623
--- Comment #7 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2009-07-02 20:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=18128)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18128&action=view)
this is the incorrect one
...with 'printf' and 'x0*y1-x1*y0'
Both with '-O2' (though -0 is enough).
--
http://gcc.
--- Comment #6 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2009-07-02 20:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=18127)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18127&action=view)
this is correct assembly
...when 'printf' and '(x0*(y0+dy) - (x0+dx)*y0)'
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
--- Comment #5 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2009-07-02 20:33 ---
It definitely doesn't work in 4.3.3.
I'll attach generated assembly.
--
galtgendo at o2 dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-02 18:26
---
Can't reproduce in any active branch, thus already fixed for 4.5.0, 4.4.1,
4.3.4 (maybe 4.3.3 too).
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2009-07-02 18:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=18125)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18125&action=view)
data for the test
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40623
--- Comment #2 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2009-07-02 18:05 ---
Due to that 'printf' thing, it seems vaguely similar
to bug 39333, however here neither of the switches mentioned there
has an effect.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40623
--- Comment #1 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2009-07-02 18:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=18124)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18124&action=view)
a testcase for the bug
As I said in the Gentoo bug,
one version of the 'area' line produces correct result,
other does
