--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-08 10:49 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> If it's just about the version, perhaps you can make -V working again.
Oh same version. Change the above to "make -b working again".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-08 10:47 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
If it's just about the version, perhaps you can make -V working again.
Requires a working --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs of course. :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
--- Comment #5 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-06-16 15:40
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Or use --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs .
>
That's been broken for some time on x86_64, see bug 32415
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 15:14 ---
Or use --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458
--- Comment #3 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-06-16 13:23
---
for the record: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-06/msg00173.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458
--- Comment #2 from kai dot extern at googlemail dot com 2009-06-16 13:18
---
Subject: Re: gcc flavours
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org schrieb:
> --- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 13:01
> ---
> Use --program-transform-name / --program-suffix. Dir
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 13:01 ---
Use --program-transform-name / --program-suffix. Directory names already
contain the gcc version.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
