--- Comment #18 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 16:37 ---
(From update of attachment 15836)
This has been committed to trunk
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #17 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 16:36 ---
(From update of attachment 15835)
This has been committed to trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31754
--- Comment #16 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 16:33 ---
Subject: Bug 31754
Author: dodji
Date: Fri Jul 11 16:32:29 2008
New Revision: 137721
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137721
Log:
2008-07-11 Dodji Seketeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/
--- Comment #15 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 12:55 ---
Subject: Bug 31754
Author: dodji
Date: Fri Jul 11 12:54:22 2008
New Revision: 137716
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137716
Log:
2008-07-11 Dodji Seketeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/31
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|dseketel at redhat dot com |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dodji at gcc dot gnu d
--- Comment #14 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-07-01 16:29 ---
Hello,
Just a quick comment on this bug.
I think that in the example you gave, gcc (at the least 4.3.0 version) is
giving a correct column location.
The expression gcc is complaining about is:
"a +- b".
That expres
--- Comment #13 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-30 17:54 ---
@Jon Grant: thanks for cheering ! :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31754
--- Comment #12 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-30 17:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=15836)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15836&action=view)
better column number in error patch [2/2]
This is a rebase of the patch [2/2] against trunk of 2008-06-30.
It has
--- Comment #11 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-30 17:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=15835)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15835&action=view)
better column number in error patch [1/2]
This is a rebase of the patch [1/2] against trunk from 2008-06-30.
--
--- Comment #10 from jg at jguk dot org 2008-06-28 01:00 ---
Dodji Seketeli, Just a quick note to say how great it is that you're working in
this enhancement. Cheers, Jon
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31754
--- Comment #9 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-27 21:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=15821)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15821&action=view)
better column number in error patch [2/2]
After applying this patch, all calls to error() gcc/cp/parser.c use an
"a
--- Comment #8 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-26 12:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=15817)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15817&action=view)
correct issues raised by reviews on the mailing list
I have corrected the issues raised at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gc
--- Comment #7 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-20 12:05 ---
(From update of attachment 15793)
This version of the patch got sent to the mailing list at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg01329.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31754
--- Comment #6 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-20 09:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=15793)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15793&action=view)
rebase against current trunk
Rebased against current trunk.
--
dseketel at redhat dot com changed:
--- Comment #5 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-18 19:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=15780)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15780&action=view)
work in progress on more accurate column numbers
Fix some compilation errors after rebasing to trunk.
--
dseket
--- Comment #4 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-18 18:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=15778)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15778&action=view)
more work on the error location patch
This patch makes all the tests in testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error*.C be aware of
--- Comment #3 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-16 11:15 ---
I forgot to say that my patch just affects the c++ front end of gcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31754
--- Comment #2 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-06-16 11:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=15774)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15774&action=view)
produce more accurate column information in error messages
This patch modifies the c++ parser to produce more accur
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-26 05:35 ---
Note that even with mapped locations this gives the wrong result.
The C++ parser has some column-number bugs.
opsy. g++ -Wall -fsyntax-only z.cc
z.cc: In function int main():
z.cc:8:61: error: wrong type argument t
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Summary|Include character count |Include c
20 matches
Mail list logo
