--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|2006-
--- Comment #8 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-04-30 17:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=11350)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11350&action=view)
A testcase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gas]$
/export/build/gnu/gcc-last/build-x86_64-linux/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 15:57 ---
Note I think Jeff's patch just exposed a bug.
Now since we don't have a testcase this is going to put into WAITING until we
have one.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-04-30 15:33 ---
Hi Jeff,
It looks like your patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01386.html
causes gcc 4.2 miscompiles binutils on Linux/x86 and Linux/x86-64.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-04-30 14:25 ---
Andrew, I tried my best to find a testcase. The best I can do so far is to
put a testcase in binutils so that when you build binutils with gcc 4.2 on
Linux/x86 and Linux/x86-64, you will get an "make check" failure in gas. I
d
--- Comment #4 from dirtyepic dot sk at gmail dot com 2006-04-30 09:59
---
Here is the testcase:
dirtyepic ~ $ cat pr27364.S
.tfloat 1.442695040888963407359924681002
dirtyepic ~ $ gcc pr27364.S
pr27364.S: Assembler messages:
pr27364.S:1: Fatal error: failed sanity check
This is from
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 07:35 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-04/msg00577.html
I don't even see how you can get 37 in general in this case.
I can see 34 but not 37.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27364
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 07:25 ---
You are wrong.
When number_of_digits_to_use is 1, we get:
3321928 / 100
Which is equal to 3
And then add 1.
Try again please.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 07:14 ---
Testcase? You know this is the nth bug you have filed without a testcase and
every time someone gets upset because you don't follow directions.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Rem
