[Bug other/26056] code quality

2006-02-02 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #4 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-02-02 08:29 --- (In reply to comment #3) > In fact I cannot reproduce the code gen that you get with 4.0.2. > You,re right. Posted 4.0.2 output was generated from slightly different sources :/ -- pluto at agmk dot net changed:

[Bug other/26056] code quality

2006-01-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords||missed-op

[Bug other/26056] code quality

2006-01-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 01:30 --- In fact I cannot reproduce the code gen that you get with 4.0.2. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/26056] code quality regression.

2006-01-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 01:28 --- So does 3.4.0 and 3.3.6. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26056

[Bug other/26056] code quality regression.

2006-01-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 01:27 --- 4.0.3 produces the same code as 4.1.0 does. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26056