[Bug other/20731] contrib/gcc_update hard code -r gcc-3_4-branch

-- What|Removed |Added CC||gerald at pfeifer dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20731

[Bug other/20731] contrib/gcc_update hard code -r gcc-3_4-branch

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-02 18:21 --- I have patches for mainline, 3.4 and 4.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug other/20731] contrib/gcc_update hard code -r gcc-3_4-branch

--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-04-02 17:22 --- Subject: Re: contrib/gcc_update hard code -r gcc-3_4-branch On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, hjl at lucon dot org wrote: > It affects all branches based on 3.4 branch, including gcc 3.4 rhl branch. I > can't just do "

[Bug other/20731] contrib/gcc_update hard code -r gcc-3_4-branch

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-02 17:00 --- It affects all branches based on 3.4 branch, including gcc 3.4 rhl branch. I can't just do "./contrib/update" in gcc 3.4 rhl branch anymore since it is hard coded to 3.4 branch. I have to explicitly add gcc 3.4 rhl bra

[Bug other/20731] contrib/gcc_update hard code -r gcc-3_4-branch

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-02 16:49 --- Again read the whole thread. Anyways if you are going to patch it, there is no reason to file a bug until nobody looks at your patch or there is no history behind the code which in this case there is hist

[Bug other/20731] contrib/gcc_update hard code -r gcc-3_4-branch

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-04-02 16:45 --- My question is why hard code it. Is there anything wrong with this patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg00173.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/20731] contrib/gcc_update hard code -r gcc-3_4-branch

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-02 16:19 --- See the thread: . -- What|Removed |Added