[Bug other/105404] new version of zlib

2024-11-16 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-11-17 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug other/105404] new version of zlib

2023-04-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 109428 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug other/105404] new version of zlib

2023-04-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- Note GCC does not call inflateGetHeader so it is not affected by CVE-2022-37434.

[Bug other/105404] new version of zlib

2023-04-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chluo at cse dot cuhk.edu.hk --- Commen

[Bug other/105404] new version of zlib

2022-05-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #7) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > > Can't see the warning when I build the current zlib library with clang. > > You might need to switch on -Wall or

[Bug other/105404] new version of zlib

2022-05-03 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404 --- Comment #7 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > Can't see the warning when I build the current zlib library with clang. You might need to switch on -Wall or (more likely) -Wextra. > Can you please paste a b

[Bug other/105404] new version of zlib

2022-05-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #4) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > > No, because we don't use the buggy Z_FIXED feature. > > Righto. Presumably the upgrade can be postponed until

[Bug other/105404] new version of zlib

2022-04-28 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug other/105404] new version of zlib

2022-04-28 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mliska at suse dot cz --- Comment #4

[Bug other/105404] new version of zlib

2022-04-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- No, because we don't use the buggy Z_FIXED feature.

[Bug other/105404] new version of zlib

2022-04-27 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > See the thread starting at > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2022-April/238497.html Thanks for that. Nick Clifton seems to think a simple rebase should be