[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #41 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-02-21 12:46 --- AFAICT this pr and the side effects have been fixed, hence closing. If someone disagree, please reopen. Thanks all for the work. -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What|Removed

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-19 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #40 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-19 23:28 --- (In reply to comment #39) > I checked in the real back end change in r156907. OK on i686/powerpc d9 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43061

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-19 Thread mikestump at comcast dot net
--- Comment #39 from mikestump at comcast dot net 2010-02-19 19:15 --- I checked in the real back end change in r156907. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43061

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-19 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #38 from mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-19 19:06 --- Subject: Bug 43061 Author: mrs Date: Fri Feb 19 19:06:38 2010 New Revision: 156907 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156907 Log: PR objc/43061 * cgraphunit.c (process_function_and_v

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-19 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #37 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-19 08:43 --- (In reply to comment #36) > I've checked in a slightly updated fix in r156877. Let us know if all the > regressions are fixed now. i686/powerpc-darwin9 - YES, thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-18 Thread mikestump at comcast dot net
--- Comment #36 from mikestump at comcast dot net 2010-02-18 22:06 --- I've checked in a slightly updated fix in r156877. Let us know if all the regressions are fixed now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43061

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-16 Thread mikestump at comcast dot net
--- Comment #35 from mikestump at comcast dot net 2010-02-16 16:25 --- Ok to the last patch for now. Feel free to file a bug about checking DECL_PRESERVE_P and add a pointer to remove the setting of DECL_ATTRIBUTES from the frontend, thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-16 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #34 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-16 14:58 --- Created an attachment (id=19889) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19889&action=view) patch with CLASS and SELECTOR refs. marked as TREE_ADDRESSABLE & DECL_PRESERVE_P (for NeXT runtim

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #33 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-16 10:14 --- (In reply to comment #32) > (In reply to comment #24) > > Yes, I think IainS is on the right track, all things in objc_cls_refs escape > > and can be read and written to in unexpected ways by the runtime. Setting

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #32 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-16 10:14 --- (In reply to comment #24) > Yes, I think IainS is on the right track, all things in objc_cls_refs escape > and can be read and written to in unexpected ways by the runtime. Setting > TREE_ADDRESSABLE sounds like a

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #31 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-16 10:06 --- Not sure about TREE_ADDRESSABLE, but certainly DECL_PRESERVED_P should be set as well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43061

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-16 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #30 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-16 09:23 --- apropos http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00587.html do you think that _OBJC_CLASS_REFERENCES_* and _OBJC_SELECTOR_REFERENCES_* should be marked as TREE_ADDRESSABLE and DECL_PRESERVE_P in

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-15 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #29 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-15 23:10 --- Created an attachment (id=19884) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19884&action=view) attach "used" attribute as well as marking vars used. Jakub's comment seems to do the trick - th

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #28 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-15 22:37 --- DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl) = tree_cons (get_identifier ("used"), NULL, DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl)); is also needed (no idea why ipa*.c/cgraphunit.c use lookup_attribute instead of testing DECL_PRESERVED_P, but they do).

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-15 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #27 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-15 21:51 --- (In reply to comment #26) > Addressability is recomputed several times. What you probably want is mark > the > decl with the used attribute (i.e. add "used" attribute to it, set TREE_USED > (decl) =

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #26 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-15 21:09 --- Addressability is recomputed several times. What you probably want is mark the decl with the used attribute (i.e. add "used" attribute to it, set TREE_USED (decl) = 1 and DECL_PRESERVE_P (decl) = 1). -- http://g

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-15 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #25 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-15 19:54 --- Hm. I tried this trivial patch: Index: gcc/objc/objc-act.c === --- gcc/objc/objc-act.c (revision 156760) +++ gcc/objc/objc-act.c (workin

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-15 Thread mikestump at comcast dot net
--- Comment #24 from mikestump at comcast dot net 2010-02-15 17:38 --- Yes, I think IainS is on the right track, all things in objc_cls_refs escape and can be read and written to in unexpected ways by the runtime. Setting TREE_ADDRESSABLE sounds like a reasonable step forward. -- mi

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #23 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 23:57 --- (In reply to comment #22) > There are no modifications visible in the assembly. But there is magic: > > .objc_cls_refs > .align 2 > L_OBJC_CLASS_REFERENCES_0: > .long L_OBJC

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-14 23:26 --- There are no modifications visible in the assembly. But there is magic: .objc_cls_refs .align 2 L_OBJC_CLASS_REFERENCES_0: .long L_OBJC_CLASS_NAME_0 what is .objc_cls_refs? Well, obvio

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #21 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 23:22 --- Created an attachment (id=19870) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19870&action=view) asm out from -O1 -g cascading-1.m @trunk 156760 this is the current asm output - it segfaults on

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-14 22:25 --- Not TREE_ADDRESSABLE var _OBJC_CLASS_REFERENCES_0 Not TREE_ADDRESSABLE var _OBJC_SELECTOR_REFERENCES_0 Not TREE_ADDRESSABLE var _OBJC_SELECTOR_REFERENCES_1 read-only var _OBJC_CLASS_REFERENCES_0 read-only var _OBJC

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #19 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 22:16 --- Created an attachment (id=19868) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19868&action=view) cascading-1.m/-fdump-ipa-all/pure-const @ trunk 15670 this is with -fno-ipa-reference. -- h

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #18 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 22:11 --- Created an attachment (id=19867) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19867&action=view) -fdump-ipa-all/static-var cascading-1.m @ trunk 156760 this is with normal options (i.e. the def

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-14 21:56 --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > That doesn't make sense. The symbol is not TREE_READONLY. > > > > Was that dump from inside get_symbol_constant_value? > > yes. > that was from a clean b

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #16 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 21:55 --- Created an attachment (id=19866) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19866&action=view) gimple for cascading-1.m @ trunk 156760 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43061

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #15 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 21:53 --- (In reply to comment #14) > That doesn't make sense. The symbol is not TREE_READONLY. > > Was that dump from inside get_symbol_constant_value? yes. that was from a clean bootstrap of trunk 156760.

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-14 21:29 --- That doesn't make sense. The symbol is not TREE_READONLY. Was that dump from inside get_symbol_constant_value? As the extract only happens from CCP2 I suppose that ipa-reference might be setting TREE_READONLY on

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #13 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 21:13 --- Created an attachment (id=19864) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19864&action=view) gdb-output for CLASS_REFERENCES_0 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43061

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-14 19:07 --- (In reply to comment #11) > Btw, I cannot make -fnext-runtime work on i?86-linux, it errors at link time > with > undefined references. Any configure options I need to supply? > The next runtime only works on Da

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-14 19:01 --- Btw, I cannot make -fnext-runtime work on i?86-linux, it errors at link time with undefined references. Any configure options I need to supply? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43061

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-14 19:00 --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Hm. So CCP through get_symbol_constant_value causes > > > you run the compile inside gdb, break on get_symbol_constant_value > > maybe I've messed somethin

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #9 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 18:50 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Hm. So CCP through get_symbol_constant_value causes > you run the compile inside gdb, break on get_symbol_constant_value maybe I've messed something up - but setting a brea

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-14 17:44 --- Hm. So CCP through get_symbol_constant_value causes : - _OBJC_CLASS_REFERENCES_0.2_1 = _OBJC_CLASS_REFERENCES_0; + _OBJC_CLASS_REFERENCES_0.2_1 = (struct objc_class *) &_OBJC_CLASS_NAME_0; _OBJC_CLASS_REFEREN

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #7 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 16:45 --- Created an attachment (id=19862) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19862&action=view) diffs for all fdump-tree-all output -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43061

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #6 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 16:33 --- Created an attachment (id=19861) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19861&action=view) optimized tree diffs. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43061

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #5 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 16:32 --- Created an attachment (id=19860) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19860&action=view) generated asm differences with/without r156519 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-14 16:28 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Track down the regression that caused this > > r156519 > > >and see what actually is the difference in generated code and/or tree/rtl > >dumps. > > what o

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #3 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 16:04 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Track down the regression that caused this r156519 >and see what actually is the difference in generated code and/or tree/rtl >dumps. what output would be the most usefu

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-14 15:25 --- Track down the regression that caused this and see what actually is the difference in generated code and/or tree/rtl dumps. Access to non-free operating systems is restricted. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho

[Bug objc/43061] 47 new GCC h...@156527 regressions

2010-02-14 Thread developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
--- Comment #1 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2010-02-14 13:46 --- confirmed, this can be reproduced outside the testsuite framework: for example... [ppc/darwin9/156749]; $ ./gcc/xgcc -B gcc ../gcc-4-5-trunk/gcc/testsuite/objc/execute/cascading-1.m -fnext-runtime -O1