https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89150
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89150
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 5 08:32:16 2019
New Revision: 268530
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268530&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-05 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/89150
* bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89150
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89150
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On February 1, 2019 7:31:35 PM GMT+01:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89150
>
>Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89150
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
I didn't know there were no tree-form bitmaps yet.
Contrary to my original assertion, I think just dropping the chain_prev
("%h.prev") marker will suffice. Normal use of a list-form bitmap starts at
the he
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89150
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89150
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
