https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88456
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88456
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Oppenlander ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #2)
> If the call is one GCC can't expand on its own (atomic operations on large
> objects needing locks, architecture lacks required atomic operation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88456
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
If the implementation were not in this source file at all and no LTO were
used, it would be unambiguous that such an out-of-line implementation
would not be used when GCC knows how to expan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
Compo
