https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86437
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86437
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I tried "-Ofast -fmax-stack-var-size=2096" and I get:
_38 = __builtin_malloc (848);
Without the max-stack-var-size option, I get:
real(kind=8) A.22[106];
Even with " -fmax-stack-var-size=2096
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86437
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #2)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> > WORKSFORME. AFAIR -Ofast implies -fstack-arrays.
>
> Yeah, right, -fstack-arrays is the crucial flag her
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86437
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> WORKSFORME. AFAIR -Ofast implies -fstack-arrays.
Yeah, right, -fstack-arrays is the crucial flag here.
> What is the output of
>
> ulimit -s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86437
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
