https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81828
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81828
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81828
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
>As 48-core ARM chips have just been announced by Qualcomm,
I have been using a 48 core ThunderX which is an ARMv8-a for almost 3 years now
:) So don't bring this up really.
Cilk+ is deprecated as nobody i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81828
--- Comment #3 from Eric ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Note Cilk+ have been deprecated:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html
As 48-core ARM chips have just been announced by Qualcomm, now seems like the
wrong time to be d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81828
--- Comment #2 from Eric ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Note Cilk+ have been deprecated:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html
As 48-core ARM chips have just been announced by Qualcomm, now seems like the
wrong time to be d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81828
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|c
